Princess Diana Death: Driver's Blood Sample Was Swapped!

Princess Diana Crash: If Driver's Blood Sample Is To Believed, Henri Paul Would Have Been Comatose!
If one were to believe the lab results of Henri Paul's blood sample, then Henri Paul would, at best have been incapacitated with a very severe pulsing migraine-like headache, and at worst would have been comatose! Either way, according to the blood sample results released by the authorities, Henri Paul would never have been able to drive on that night of August 31, 1997, let alone swerve and collide with a pillar after some undeniably pretty skillful driving!

Significance Of Henri Paul's Lab Results
According to the official report, Henri Paul's Blood Alcohol Concentration (BAC) at the time of his death was an astounding 0.30% which is almost 4 times over the legal limit! (As far as California State is concerned a BAC of 0.08% renders you as legally unfit to drive.) Such a blood alcohol level means that Henri Paul would have been teetering on the verge of unconsciousness if anything, certainly he would not have been able to steer a vehicle in any manner at all.

If one were to translate Henri Paul's supposed blood alcohol levels into the number of drinks he'd have had to imbibe to attain those levels this is how it would look:

1) 12 drinks in 1 hour (if his stomach was empty)

2) 24 drinks in 1 hour (if he'd eaten a meal)

That number of drinks amply illustrates that Henri Paul would not have been able to talk coherently, walk, let alone drive! If the blood sample accredited to Henri Paul was actually his…HENRI PAUL WOULD HAVE BEEN STUMBLING, RAVING, ROLLING DRUNK!

How Did Toxic Levels Of Carbon Monoxide Appear In His Blood Sample?
Before I tackle the rather intriguing puzzle of how toxic levels of carbon monoxide were introduced into Henri Paul's blood it is interesting to note that carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning coincidentally happens to be the most common type of fatal poisoning in France! (The significance of this will become apparent later on).

The levels of carbon monoxide found in Henri Paul's supposed blood sample was in excess of 2,000 PPM (parts per million) or 0.20%. With such blood levels Henri Paul would have experienced an excruciating blinding headache, dizziness, nausea and would have been dead within 1.5 hours from initial introduction.

Surely it truly is stretching the bounds of belief (suspended or otherwise) that a human being could possibly function normally (or what appeared normal to everybody) with such a lethal dose of carbon monoxide in their bloodstream!

Was The Carbon Monoxide Introduced From Crash Vehicle?
Some devoted advocates for the accident scenario may well postulate that the carbon monoxide got into Henri Paul as a result of the idling Mercedes engine within the confines of the Point d'Alma tunnel. Well, if that were the case then Dodi Fayed and Princess Diana would have exhibited similarly toxic levels of carbon monoxide.

But guess what…surprise…surprise, they didn't. In any case the tunnel was way too large and well ventilated for anybody to accumulate such a lethal dose of CO (carbon monoxide) whether they'd been there for hours with a running engine.



Moreover even if one were to pursue the CO intoxication from the exhaust of the idling engine of the wrecked Mercedes angle, such a scenario would still be impossible for the simple fact that Henri Paul was killed on impact! I guess a broken neck will do that!

So now the question remains, and it really is THE ONLY QUESTION, how could that carbon monoxide have gotten into Henri Paul's supposed posthumous blood sample? Quite often the solution to a puzzle is the simplest and most obvious and in this case it boils down to the inescapable fact that:

The Blood Sample Cited By Official Report Was Not Henri Paul's!
The most obvious step to prove beyond a shadow-of –doubt whether the blood sample belonged to Henri Paul or not would have been to conduct a DNA test; but of course this was never done and unsurprisingly there are no remnants of the blood samples in question. So legally there is absolutely no basis on which those samples could be attributed to Henri Paul!

The autopsy done on Henri Paul was carried out by Professor Dominique Lecompte in front of one Commander Mules and the following is what is known:

1) Supposedly 5 samples were taken from the body of Henri Paul.

2) Commander Mules stated that they were handled and processed in the same manner.

3) Two of those blood samples were sent to different labs for testing; the other 3 samples remained at the lab where Professor Dominique Lecompte conducted the autopsy.

4) Of those two samples sent off both supposedly revealed the massive levels of alcohol as well as toxic levels of carbon monoxide. Contrary to normal procedure the unused portions of these samples were conveniently never preserved (ensures that no pesky confirmatory DNA test could be conducted at a later date)!

5) Later on in a Paris Court, under oath Professor Dominique Lecompte revealed that she only took three samples of blood from Henri Paul's body under Commander Mule's supervision (to date nobody can adequately explain where the other 2 samples came from).

6) The unused portions of the 3 samples that Professor Lecompte concedes to have taken should remain but once again guess what…NO SAMPLES REMAIN!

7) 4 days after his death another blood sample was drawn from Henri Paul with Judge Herve Stephan in attendance (French Judge Heading the French Investigation). This sample was sent to the same lab as the other mysterious 2 samples had been; this sample like the others was handled by a Dr. Pepin. This sample was drawn from a different area of the body using a different means of extraction. When the results came back astonishingly they were almost identical as the other two suspicious samples handled by Dr. Pepin's lab.

According to several top international experts such closely similar results under such variably different circumstances was highly suspect to say the least. MORE AMAZING STILL WAS HOW THE UNUSED PORTION OF THAT NEW BLOOD SAMPLE MYSTERIOUSLY DISAPPEARED TOO!

8) The only sample that was tested for Henri Paul's DNA and confirmed said DNA came from one of the original three samples drawn by Prof. Lecompte. Nobody however ever bothered to clarify this little fact for it was more expedient to let the world think that the bogus samples were indeed the ones belonging to Henri Paul!

9) Though it was claimed that the blood samples were all handled, processed and stored in the same manner, this was not true at all. In fact one of the containers allegedly containing a blood sample from Henri Paul exhibited evidence of another name having been hastily scratched out and replaced with that of Henri Paul!

Princess Diana Crash: Official Report Lied That Driver Was Drunk!

Princess Diana Death: Official Report Was Bogus!
The gospel according to the official report has it that "boozehound Henri Paul" snuggled up behind the wheel of the Mercedes S280 on the night of August 31, 1997 and proceeded to drive in what can best be described as a reckless and dangerous manner (attaining speeds of 196 km/h!) before colliding with the 13th pillar of the Point d'Alma tunnel ending the lives of Princess Diana, Dodi Fayed as well as himself!

Well that's the official line…but guess what?

Tell A Lie Long And Loud Enough And Soon It Becomes The Truth!
Unfortunately for the individuals who masterminded the death of Princess Diana, Mohammed Al Fayed happened to be the owner of the Paris Ritz Hotel. This meant that the usual trick of conveniently disappearing compromising evidence (in this case video footage) could not be so easily applied here. In this particular case the errant footage is the CCTV security footage from the Ritz Hotel on the night of the crash showing a stone cold sober Henri Paul walking normally, chatting to Dodi and Princess Diana moments before entering the vehicle!

Would Princess Diana, Dodi Fayed or Trevor Rhys Jones Step Into A Car Driven By A Raving Drunk?
Have you ever seen someone who's drunk in action? It's quite easy to tell they are drunk isn't it, for the mere fact they tend to exhibit characteristics commonly associated with such a condition. Okay… I'll admit to having been drunk at least once in my life which endows me with more than necessary credentials to talk authoritatively on the subject (besides, more importantly, as a reformed Party Animal I have witnessed scores of other drunken individuals in action…so I know what I'm talking about!)

Henri Paul showed none of the usual symptoms characteristic of a drunken individual. Such symptoms include:

1. Slurred speech;

2. Unsteady gait (staggering and unable to walk straight...the basis of the test that cop's subject you to if they think that you're a drink-drive candidate);

3. Impaired judgment and inability to make rational decisions;

4. An accompanying odor of booze; and

5. Glazed drippy facial features.

Henri Paul showed none of such characteristics and as mentioned above, before they set off in the Mercedes, Dodi Fayed and Princess Diana chatted with Henri Paul. Neither of them showed any signs that they were concerned about Henri Paul's fitness to drive.

Besides, surely bodyguard Trevor Rhys Jones should have at least detected something? I mean this was a man who was trained to protect dignitaries! Surely it would fall within his job description and abilities to recognize when the chauffeur is drunk or not. In any case when Trevor Rhys Jones finally regained consciousness after the crash, although he could not remember a number of details about it, he did categorically state that Henri Paul was not drunk!

The official report evidently pushed the "impaired judgment" angle in the press and media so much so that soon enough most of the world believed that it Diana and Dodi died because their drunk driver thought it best to outrun the paparazzi in a car chase that attained speeds of 196 km/h before their car finally slammed into a pillar!

Eyewitness Accounts Refute Drunken Driver Story!
Drunk driving is commonly associated with a vehicle weaving erratically across the road, but according to multiple eyewitness accounts the only weaving and erratic driving that night was done by a motorbike seating two riders, and a small vehicle in front of Diana's Mercedes which forced Henri Paul to brake and finally take the left lane to overtake said vehicle. These were also the two vehicles widely believed to have induced the accident. Read more about that here.

Not a single one of the several eyewitnesses that night state that the Mercedes was moving erratically or in a fashion suggesting that the driver was drunk.

In fact for a "drunk driver", Henri Paul showed remarkable driving skills! As the Mercedes approached the tunnel entrance the car in front started braking dangerously and performing other hazardous maneuvers such that Henri Paul deemed it best to accelerate and overtake it (actions not consistent with a man as intoxicated as Henri Paul was supposed to be according to the official report.

Unfortunately a 16-meter skid mark which was quite possibly the best evidence to irrefutably determine whether Henri Paul was driving drunk (or not) was (as seemed to be the norm in this case) suspiciously cleaned up hours after the crash before professionals could examine it (and thus determine whether it was a skid mark as a result of a controlled braking or an out-of-control one)!

But if Henri Paul was truly drunk, the only time that he appeared to manifest such symptoms would have been when the Mercedes S280 smashed into the 13^th central pillar of the Point d'Alma tunnel. But alas…we will never truly know!

What we do know is that at the Ritz Hotel he parked competently and without incident. When he pulled away from the Ritz Hotel at 12.20 a.m. hotly pursued by a pack of ravenous paparazzi and assassins he drove decisively and quickly never showing the slightest signs of drunkenness that the masterminds of the plot so cowardly fabricated as his legacy (plenty of witnesses, video footage as well as photos can corroborate this fact)!

Bottom Line: That Henri Paul was drunk and responsible for the crash is nothing more than a grossly fabricated story concocted by the plotters and reinforced by a gullible (and in some cases collaborative) press plus media to confuse an emotionally distraught public!