Almost 20 Years Since Princess Diana's Death: Her Life Was Much More Than Her Final Moments of Existence

It is almost twenty full years since Princess Diana passed away. Since that time, the world has moved on but nonetheless never forgotten her. I started this blog in 2007, ten years after her death, to highlight the controversy and unresolved questions surrounding that fateful night. But now, it's time to reflect on her broader legacy—her compassion, activism, and the meaningful change she brought into the world.

A Childhood Marked by Privilege and Pain

Diana Frances Spencer was born on July 1, 1961, into British aristocracy. Although raised in a privileged world, her early life was far from idyllic. Her parents' bitter divorce affected her deeply and planted the seeds of empathy that would later fuel her humanitarian work.

The Royal Wedding: A Fairytale with Shadows

In 1981, Diana became the Princess of Wales when she married Prince Charles in a globally televised event. But while the world celebrated, behind the palace walls was a different story. Diana struggled with isolation and a strained marriage. Despite that, she rose above it and began crafting her own identity—one focused on purpose, not protocol.

A Heart for the Marginalized

Princess Diana’s legacy is most powerfully remembered through her charity work and her unwavering compassion for the forgotten and the suffering.

·        HIV/AIDS Awareness: At a time when fear dominated public discourse, Diana visited hospitals and comforted patients, helping break down stigma with one simple act: human touch.

·        Homelessness: As patron of Centrepoint, she didn’t just attend events—she sat with homeless youth, listened to their stories, and brought attention to their plight.

·        Landmine Activism: In 1997, she walked through a live minefield in Angola. That iconic image galvanized global support for the Ottawa Treaty banning landmines.

Style with Substance

·        Diana’s fashion choices were often bold statements—not of vanity, but of voice. She understood how royal fashion could shift public perception:

·        The infamous 'Revenge Dress' was more than a fashion moment—it was a declaration of independence.

·        Her modest attire during charity visits showed respect and solidarity with those she served.

·        She auctioned 79 dresses in 1997, raising over $5 million for AIDS and cancer charities.

A Devoted Mother Above All

What Diana cherished most was being a mother. She defied royal norms to raise Prince William and Prince Harry with affection and accessibility.

She insisted on doing school runs and taking her sons on everyday outings, giving them glimpses of normalcy.

She taught them to serve by example—bringing them along on visits to shelters and clinics.

That influence lives on. Both princes have carried on her values in their own causes, from mental health awareness to veteran support.

The Enduring Princess Diana Legacy

·        Even decades after her passing, Diana's name remains synonymous with kindness, courage, and humanitarian spirit. Her legacy continues through:

·        The Diana Award: Recognizing young changemakers making a positive social impact.

·        The Diana Memorial Fund: Raised over £138 million for charitable efforts globally.

·        Public memory: Documentaries, books, and tributes keep her story alive and relevant.

A Tragic End, A Worldwide Mourning

On August 31, 1997, Diana’s life was tragically cut short in a car accident in Paris. She was just 36. The world went into mourning—millions laid flowers, lit candles, and stood in silence.

·        Her funeral was broadcast to over 2.5 billion people. The grief was not limited to the UK. Diana belonged to the world. She was our People’s Princess.

More Than a Royal—A Symbol of Empathy

As we look back on nearly 20 years since her untimely passing, it’s clear that Princess Diana’s legacy was never about her title, but about her actions. Her life taught us that true royalty comes from compassion, not crowns.

May her memory continue to inspire acts of kindness, empathy, and courage for generations to come.

Princess Diana Death: An Interesting Turn Of Events!

Princess Diana Crash: All Roads Lead To The Embassy!
As the white Fiat Uno screeched away from the scene of the crash in the Point d'Alma tunnel, hot on its tail was another white car, a Mercedes. The getaway of both these cars cuaght the attention of Gary Hunter, a London based lawyer who was in a room on the 3rd floor of the Royal Alma Hotel. In his own words this is what he ahd to say: "My own feeling is that these people were in a hurry not to be there. I am confident that car was getting off the scene. It was obvious they were getting away from something and that they were in a hurry. It looked quite sinister."

Why Didn't The Fiat Uno Speed Away Along The Freeway

As the two cars sped away they did a most unusual thing. Instead of hightailing it as fast as possible along the freeway and putting as much distance between themselves and the wrecked Mercedes S280 in the tunnel, they executed a high speed tire-screeching turn to proceed along rue Jean Goujean!

A Straight Path To The British Embassy!
Interestingly enough that u-turn the two vehicles made put them on the fastest and shortest route from the Point d'Alma tunnel to the British Embassy located just six blocks away! But why would fleeing suspects head in, what for all intents and purposes, appears to be an illogical direction?

Contingency Plan In The Event Of Vehicular Damage.
Undoubtedly the brains behind the road traffic assassination of Princess Diana must have considered the possibility that any of their cars involved in setting up the crash might incur damage during execution of the faked accident. In the event that happened they'd obviously have set up a contingency plan, which may explain why the Fiat Uno was headed in the direction of the British Embassy.

If, as much circumstantial evidence suggests, MI6 was involved in the murder of Princess Diana then it would make perfect sense for the damaged Fiat Uno to seek refuge at the British Embassy until The Heat (police activity) had simmered down! That would be the last place that anybody would think of looking…at least for a while until inconsistencies started cropping up.

Fiat Uno Found By Al Fayed Investigatory Team
The Fiat Uno was eventually located by Mohamed Al Fayed's (Dodi's dad) private snooping. Where the full might of the French authorities had failed, Mohamed Al fayed succeeded…but I guess unlike the French police Al Fayed was highly motivated and it didn't hurt that he had very deep pockets to reinforce that motivation!

The Fiat Uno had been repainted and was up for sale at the time it was located. The car had indeed belonged to soon-to-be-murdered paparazzi Jean-Paul Andanson at the time of Dodi Fayed's and Princess Diana's death. Although French police had questioned Andanson about his white Fiat Uno early on in the official investigation, they were soons satisfied that his was not the car involved in the crash.

The French police's quick elimination of Andanson as a suspect was all the more surprising because Andanson had embarked on some pretty suspicious movement around the time of the crash and his only alibi removing him from proximity to the crime scene was a gasoline purchase receipt reflecting that he was in another part of France at the time of the accident.

Forensic evidence of paint scratch traces irrefutably put his white Fiat Uno at the scene of the crime!

Princess Diana Crash: Blood Sample Belonged To Suicide Victim Not Driver!

Princess Diana Death: Blood Sample Exhibited All The Hallmarks Of Suicide Victim!

It is now known that the blood sample cited in the official report as belonging to driver Henri Paul was not in fact his! Subsequent investigation revealed that not only was the chain of evidence critically broken, but it also seems that certain parties were involved in purposefully falsifying results! Read about it here.

As clearly illustrated below that controversial blood sample strongly possessed characteristics one would expect to find in a suicide victim not a man who had been functioning normally:

1) Extremely high levels of alcohol

2) Toxic levels of carbon monoxide

3) Antidepressants

In an attempt to pin such a blood sample on Henri Paul the plotters had to create a picture of an individual who was a chronic alcoholic in the mind of the public. This image of a chronic alcoholic was also the plotters key to explaining how Henri Paul could apparently function normally whilst heavily intoxicated! The basis being that after longterm exposure to a drug (in this case heavy use of alcohol) the body adapts by recalibrating itself through a build up of tolerance to the drug enabling the individual to function normally...just so long as they routinely get their fix!

Without Constant Booze Intake Driver Would Have Shown Withdrawal Symptoms
Henri Paul would have had to imbibe a good amount of alcohol every single day to avoid withdrawal symptoms which in the case of booze characteristically manifest as delirium tremens, otherwise known as the DTs or the shakes; as the name (the shakes) implies, this particular withdrawal symptom commonly has the afflicted individual twitching uncontrollably!

Other symptoms of delirium tremens include visual hallucinations, confusion, agitation and a moderate to severe degree of disorientation. Certainly these are not characteristics that Henri Paul showed at any time and it is unthinkable to believe that he could have been so afflicted without anybody ever having noticed!

Autopsy Of Henri Paul Showed No Evidence Of Alcoholism

If Henri Paul were truly a chronic alcoholic as we were made to believe then surely the autopsy conducted on his body would have revealed at the very least some evidence corroborating such fact! But guess what? There was no such evidence; no trace or hint of liver damage as is routinely found in alcoholics!

In fact what is particularly interesting is how the private lab (Dr. Pepin's Lab) that conducted the analysis of the two contentious blood samples (the ones that magically appeared from nowhere and then just as magically disappeared after "proving" that Henri Paul was drunk) came up with the miraculous conclusion that Henri Paul was "in a state of moderate chronic alcoholism for a minimum of one week." Not only was such a statement unsubstantiated by the autopsy findings, in and of itself, it was most strange indeed!

Henri Paul Was A Licensed Pilot With Over 600 HRs of Flying Time!

Nowhere is it mentioned in the official report that the supposed chronic alcoholic, Henri Paul, was an accomplished pilot who was highly thought of by his former flight instructor. I guess even the instructor was unable to recognize a raving alcoholic in spite of when sitting right next to one in the narrow confines of a cockpit!

Two days before the crash, Henri Paul had passed every test required to become a licensed pilot. Hmmmm...perhaps that may explain his drunkeness; he was so ecstatic about getting his license he decided to go on an alcoholic binge! Implausible as this last scenario is, it certainly sounds more plausible than the official version that Henri Paul was a chronic alcoholic!

Princess Diana Death: Reconstructing What Happened From Eyewitness Accounts!

Princess Diana Crash: Five Minutes On The Road To Eternity!

My previous post listed a number of eyewitness accounts that glaringly contradicted the official account and report of what happened! Click here to read it!

On this post I am going to reconstruct from the sample of eyewitness accounts what I believe happened that fateful night:

August 31, 1997, the night that Princess Diana died is much shrouded in controversy and conflicting reports about what really happened. In fact there’s so much inconsistency over the events of that night, about the only aspect that isn’t under contention is the fact that at 12.20 a.m. in the night, Diana and Dodi in a chauffeured Mercedes with bodyguard Trevor Rhys Jones riding shotgun left the Paris Ritz Hotel and barely five minutes later at 12.25 a.m. were involved in a fatal car crash!

To date the official report still cites the crash as nothing more than a tragic traffic accident, notwithstanding the very many eyewitness reports that poke glaring and substantial holes in that report! With respect to some of the eyewitness accounts here is a reconstruction of what may have really happened that night:

Flushing The Prey Out Into The Open!

For some inexplicable reason, Dodi Fayed and Princess Diana decided not to spend the night at the Ritz Hotel in Paris (which incidentally was owned by Mohammed Al Fayed) where they were dining, but instead opted to brave the howling and ravenous pack of paparazzi circling outside the hotel, by making a dash for Dodi’s apartment located on Rue Arsene-Houssaye.

This in of itself was a very strange decision because from the moment they’d arrived in Paris from Sardinia on August 30^th, they were incessantly hounded and harassed by paparazzi! In fact people were later to remark they had never seen paparazzi behave so aggressively (were some of those aggressive paparazzi really security agents (MI6) setting the stage for what was to come later?). Thus it is of vital importance to know what made Princess Diana and Dodi Fayed leave the safety and comfort of the Ritz Hotel to brave the paparazzi outside? Could it have been some security concern concocted by the plotters in an attempt to flush out their prey towards the trap they’d set?

Springing The Trap

Assuming that Diana and Dodi were headed for Dodi's apartment the quickest route would have been to take the Place de la Concorde but according to several witnesses that route was blocked by a car full of paparazzi (quite likely that car was full of security agents whose job was to make sure that Princess Diana's Mercedes took their desired route, i.e., into the tunnel. Thierry H was one such witness who saw a car filled with men blocking the Mercedes' access to the Place de la Concorde.

Click Here To See Photo of Point d'Alma Tunnel Entrance

Motorbike And Unknown Car Force Mercedes Into Left Lane!

Brenda Wells, a secretary from London who went missing shortly after giving her statement to the French Police, said that as she approached the Point d'Alma Tunnel she was run off the road by a large powerful motorbike ridden by two individuals. Two other witnesses who, quite understandably chose to remain anonymous, were quoted by the newspaper Journal du Dimanche on September 9, 1997 as having witnessed the following:

Witness One: "The Mercedes was driving on the right hand, shortly before the entry of the tunnel, preceded by a dark-colored automobile, of which make I cannot say. This car clearly was attempting to force the Mercedes to brake . . . The driver of the Mercedes veered into the left-hand lane, and then entered the tunnel.''

Witness Two: "The Mercedes was traveling behind another automobile. I believe that the reason the Mercedes accelerated so suddenly, was to try to veer into the left lane, and pass that car.''

Motorbike Weaved From Left Then To The Right!

Both of the anonymous witnesses mentioned above state that the thing that first drew their attention in the direction of the Point d'Alma was the sound of a powerful engine gunning…the sound a vehicle might make when shifting into low gear as if to overtake. And indeed that is precisely what Henri Paul appeared to do when the car in front forced him to brake. He gunned the engine and moved into the left lane to pass the suspicious car in front (could this be the black car that vanished witness Brenda Wells mentioned in her statement to the French police?)

Brenda Well's statement also (significantly) distinguishes the powerful motorbike with two riders as being the only bike at that point in time behind Princess Diana's Mercedes. According to her account it was only after the crash that the rest of the paparazzi pack turned up!

So now Princess Diana's Mercedes is in the left lane and speeding very fast towards the tunnel, almost as if the driver and occupants feared for their lives…suggesting what they had just experienced was not normal paparazzi behavior.

Witnesses who were inside the tunnel at the time, also speak of a large powerful motorbike ridden by two individuals that raced up to the Mercedes on the left side, then pulled ahead slightly before swerving to the right of the Mercedes abruptly. At that point many of the witnesses claim they then saw a very bright flash of light followed by a tremendous bang! Two such witnesses were Francoise and Valerie Levistre who were driving ahead of Princess Diana's limousine in the tunnel.

Interpretation

It is a well documented fact that Princess Diana's Mercedes slammed into the thirteenth pillar of the tunnel before bouncing off and smashing into the wall like a pinball; the narrow confinement and speeds involved increased the chances of fatalities.

Here's my interpretation of what happened:

1. Just before entering the tunnel the mysterious car in front of the Mercedes starts braking dangerously alarming Henri Paul who accelerates and veers to the left to overtake it. This was actually what the plotters desired, to get the Mercedes in the left lane.

2. The powerful motorbike with the two riders cuts off Brenda Wells preventing her from entering the tunnel at this crucial point (the fewer witnesses the better). The motorbike then surges forwards and quickly catches up with the Mercedes, squeezes between the Mercedes and the central pillars of the tunnel before pulling slightly ahead and swerving suddenly and dangerously to the right.

3. At this point Henri Paul, like most anybody else, would instinctively steer the Mercedes left to avoid the motorbike. But just at that moment the rider on the back of the motorbike used a laser strobe light which illuminated the previously dark tunnel with a brilliant white flash that blinded Henri Paul and everyone else in the Mercedes.

4. After the flash from the strobe light Henri Paul was temporarily and completely blinded but the image of the motorbike dangerously close in front on the right of the Mercedes would have been engraved in his mind so he would have continued his leftward drift towards the center of the tunnel in hopes of avoiding the bike.

At this stage witnesses tell of hearing a loud bang! Could this have been a remote-controlled detonation that completely incapacitated the controls of the Mercedes effectively rendering all navigation impossible?

5. Henri Paul, despite being blinded, probably tried to make navigational corrections to ensure that the Mercedes somehow didn't slam into that concrete pillars in the center of the tunnel…and this is where the Fiat Uno came into play. This was the same car witnessed by Souad Mouffakir and her husband, who were in the tunnel at the time, moments before and after the crash. According to them the Fiat Uno had come from behind accelerating very rapidly and closing up to them as though it were about to overtake, but instead slowed down parallel to their car (inches away) almost as if the driver was waiting for something.

He was…he was waiting for Princess Diana's Mercedes.

The Fiat Uno's job was probably to ram the Mercedes ensuring that it collided with the column of the tunnel; in fact such a scenario pretty much reflects what Mouffakir said she saw. So in essence the Fiat Uno was the insurance policy…the finisher as it were. The job of the Fiat Uno driver was to make certain that the Mercedes slammed into the pillar!

6. The dozen or so men seen loitering in the tunnel moments before the crash by record producer Jacques Morel, were probably the clean-up crew. Their task was to tidy up the loose ends and make sure the scene reflected the accident scenario they had gone to great lengths to create.

In all likelihood one of those men was the individual seen by a number of witnesses leaping out of the wreckage of the Mercedes as they got closer. He could have well been the man who removed Henri Paul's head of the blaring horn and this could also have been the very individual who introduced the lethal levels of carbon monoxide as well as alcohol found in Henri Paul's bloodstream (to make the accident look like the mistake of a drunk)!

The rest of the clean-up crew were probably involved in crowd control and quite likely employed to add more confusion to an already confused scene. Indeed witnesses Mike Walker, Tom Richardson and Joanna Luz were discouraged from entering the tunnel immediately after the crash by a man screaming the car was going to explode (hmmm…sounds like crowd control to me.) Some witnesses also claim there was an individual dressed as a fireman on scene well before emergency vehicles arrived! I

Stanley Culbreath a tourist from the US described the inordinately long delay before anyone tried to free Princess Diana. Of the one policeman he saw there, this is what he had to say: "It was at least 15 minutes before an ambulance arrived and the one policeman who was there made no attempt to help anyone who was in that wreck…"

Yup! It sure sounds like those men seen loitering about the tunnel a few minutes before the crash certainly had their roles figured out. Some of them probably changed into police uniforms and other emergency /fire crew uniforms to discourage anyone from attempting to help the victims (classic crowd control)!

Princess Diana: Paparazzi Identified As Owner Of Car That Rammed Mercedes!

Princess Diana: The Suspicious Movements Of White Fiat Uno On The Night Of The Crash
On May 5, 2000, a badly burned body with a bullet hole neatly drilled in to the head was discovered in some woods in Nantes not far from Paris, France. A series of month long DNA tests finally concluded beyond any doubt whatsoever that those charred remains belonged to Jean-Paul Andanson a member of the paparazzi who had been stalking Princess Diana and Dodi Fayed up and down the Mediterranean.

Who Was The Mysterious Jean-Paul Andanson?

So who was Jean Paul Andanson?

Described by some as the original godfather of modern day paparazzi, Andanson was a hard hitting, flamboyant self-styled photographer who specialized in celebrity shots. By the time of his death at age 54 his photography had made him into a millionaire.

For sure Andanson was not the only paparazzi hounding the ill-fated couple on August 31, 1997, but what makes Jean-Paul stand out was the fact that he owned a white Fiat Uno!

Was Andanson's White Fiat Uno The Car That Rammed The Mercedes In The Tunnel?

Okay let's clear up one little point here...just because he owned a white Fiat Uno doesn't mean that Andanson's Fiat Uno was indeed the car seen streaking from the tunnel shortly after the crash. After all there had to be at least thousands of other White Unos whirring their way around Paris. But...

Andanson's Fiat Uno hid a dirty little secret!

Not only was it repainted soon after the events of that fateful August 31st night in 1997 (hmmmm...could this be coincidence) forensic evidence determined beyond any doubt that the car in which Jean-Paul Andanson's charred remains were found was definitely the vehicle which clipped Princess Diana's Mercedes!

Investigators determined that this was the wanted car by matching paint-scratch traces found on the side view mirror of the Mercedes to paint traces found on the Fiat Uno! They achieved this by spectrographically analyzing the various absorption bands of the different paints!

Tomorrow: How could investigators commit such a major bloop in their handling of the initial investigation? In a bungling fiasco worthy of a Michael Moore docudrama how did the French Police come to the conclusion that Andanson was driven to suicide because of his wife's indiscretions? Why was Andanson really killed...was it his chutzpah that finally brought him to this grisly end of the road! How could this unbreakable trend of investigatory bungling have continued unabated?

Princess Diana Crash: Prime Suspect Found Burnt To A Crisp!

Princess Diana Crash: Mystery of The White Fiat Uno

"We heard a loud bang then moments later we saw a white Fiat Uno and a motorbike racing out of the tunnel at high speed!" Those were the damning words of several eyewitnesses to the crash that killed Princess Diana, Dodi Fayed, Henri Paul and seriously injured bodyguard Trevor Rhys Jones.

Yet in spite of those eyewitness claims the authorities on both sides of the channel still stuck to the story that the accident was precisely that…a tragic accident!

HELLO REALITY CHECK! The only reason someone guns away from the scene of an accident is because they were involved in some manner or otherwise have something to hide. But did the authorities take this into consideration? Noooo…they were pursuing a different agenda!

3 Years After Princess Diana Crash Mysterious White Fiat Uno Finally Found!

Where was the white Fiat Uno? What happened to the white Fiat Uno? Who was the owner of the white Fiat Uno? These were the questions that constantly dogged the French Police and British authorities; egged on by an angry Mohammed Fayed (father of Dodi Fayed) who from the get-go always contended that the crash was a carefully conceived plot to kill his son and the princess.

Despite what some claimed to be the manhunt of the century and biggest police dragnet in French history, the driver and the white Fiat Uno were never found …that is until May 5, 2000 when someone stumbled across the burned wreckage of a small vehicle in the woods in Nantes, a place not far from Paris.

Within the wreckage was the charred remains of what once used to be human. The body was burned to such an extent that it took police almost one month of DNA testing before they could determine that those charred broiled remains were what was left of one Jean-Paul Andanson, one-time proud owner of a white Fiat Uno!

Owner Of White Fiat Uno Shoots Himself To Death…After 1st Burning Himself To Death!

No, the above headline is not an error neither did you read it wrong!

According to the French Police and The Mail On Sunday (newspaper in England) Andanson apparently was so aggrieved over his wife cheating on him that he of all things decided to commit suicide by fire! Funny though, there was no mention of the bullet neatly drilled into his head…which kinda puzzles me; how could a dead man rattle 'n' shake his crisp-fried bones and smokin' tissue to shoot himself in the head?

Hmmmm…I dunno about you but to me it sure looks like someone wanted Jean-Paul Andanson very very dead…that's why I'm going with the theory that somebody or somebodies had themselves a right-ole-merry barbecue in the middle of the forest where the main dish was crispy-fried human…or Jean-Paul Andanson to be exact!

So the question remains, unless Andanson was somehow connected with the crash in the tunnel why would parties unknown go to such lengths to silence him. Was he after all the owner of the much-witnessed and very notorious white Fiat Uno seen screeching out of the tunnel like a bat-outta-hell, or was he just another unfortunate coincidence in a series of never ending coincidences surrounding the Princess Diana Crash!

Coming Tomorrow: Was Andanson the owner of the white Fiat Uno that rammed Mercedes in the tunnel? Where and what was he doing on the night of the crash? And why would anyone want to frame his death as a suicide?

Princess Diana's Death: The Mystery of The Stolen Mercedes

Princess Diana: The Disturbing Events Surrounding Her Death
One would expect that with the financial means Dodi Fayed and Princess Diana had at their disposal there was absolutely no reason why they should have been chauffeured in a vehicle that had been snatched at gunpoint a few days prior to the fateful night of August 31, 1997.

But that is precisely what happened!

The car in which the ill-fated couple was traveling, a Mercedes Benz S280, had been stolen some days prior to the crash. This fact on its own is perhaps at best nothing more than pure coincidence but where that event turns decidedly strange is how that very Mercedes was returned a few days earlier in pristine condition save for one very important aspect…

THE ONBOARD COMPUTER CHIP WAS MISSING FROM THE STOLEN MERCEDES!

The onboard computer chip controls, amongst other things, navigation, acceleration, steering and braking of a vehicle. Considering that Princess Diana's death was due to a car crash, the fact that the Mercedes S280 involved in the crash had its onboard computer chip stolen some days earlier (and nothing else mind you…suggesting the car-snatchers were no ordinary thieves) pushes the pervasive accident account onto firmer conspiracy territory.

To date there actually exists a well established assassination technique from the 1980s (developed by the British SAS) nicknamed "The Boston Brakes" which involves steering, braking and acceleration capability being taken over by remote control!

In fact world famous explorer and former SAS officer, Sir Ranulph Fiennes did indeed confirm the relatively common use of this assassination method with particular reference to the death in England of one Major Michael Marman in a car accident that bears uncanny resemblance to that of Princess Diana, Dodi Fayed and Henri Paul.

So what could have been the motive behind the theft of the Mercedes Benz S280 that was involved in the Paris tunnel crash on August 31, 1997?

Well let's see; assuming you want to execute a very sensitive, high profile assassination but at the same time create as little fuss as possible, the best way to go about it is to make it look like an accident.

Keeping that in mind the disappearance of the onboard computer chip from the "Crash S280" then makes a lot of sense. Steal the car, remove the onboard computer chip, replace the old chip with a new doctored onboard computer chip that allows another party to gain remote control over the car and tada...

You've got yourselves a genuine accident in the making!

Furthermore, very suspiciously, the stolen Mercedes Benz S280 was the only vehicle "available" to the Princess and her companions that night! Talk about leaving nothing to chance!

MERCEDES BENZ DENIED ACCESS TO EXAMINE CRASH VEHICLE!

Initial reports leaked to the press suggested that the Mercedes Benz S280 involved in the crash had been zooming at speeds in the neighborhood of 120 mph! If this were translated into km/h this would come out to a staggering 192 kilometers per hour!

In fact reports of the day had the speedometer of the car stuck at 196 kilometers per hour (122 mph).

The truth of the matter is if the car had been traveling anywhere near those speeds, seat-belt-or-not NOBODY would have survived that crash (the only person to survive the crash was bodyguard Trevor Rhys-Jones who sat in the passenger seat and is widely believed to have been an operative of MI6 or MI5 branches of the British Secret Service).

Many professional drivers have decried the authority-cited-speeds (120mph region) as being absolutely preposterous and from the evidence available to them put the car at about 60 mph (96km/h) at the time of the accident.

To date, Mercedes Benz has never been able to examine the car for the simple reason the authorities never allowed them. This in itself is very strange because Mercedes Benz experts should have been party to the panel of experts examining the car!

Why?

How about if for no other reason than they built and engineered the vehicle and thus would have been in an excellent position to determine how fast the car was going and what caused the various impact damage to the vehicle.

It would appear though that an internal investigation conducted by Mercedes Benz (albeit with the rather limited information available to them) seemed to suggest a speed of 60mph was far more reasonable than the 120mph spread by authorities and that the safety protective features of the Mercedes more or less behaved as expected.

This may explain why Trevor Rhys-Jones who was seat-belted in the passenger seat and thereby in the least likely position for surviving such an accident survived! (The passenger seat is known in the industry as "The Death Seat").

The Mercedes engineered safety mechanisms that helped preserve Mr Jones' life, incorporate the engine block being forced under the car and not into the passenger compartment following the tremendous force from such a collision as the one that occurred in the Paris tunnel that night.

The widespread view is that had the Princess Diana and Dodi Fayed been wearing seatbelts they would have likely survived the crash! (Hmmm…perhaps not! Princess Diana did survive the crash and actually spoke to a French Doctor (not affiliated with the authorities who arrived shortly after) who was passing by at the time of the accident and as he administered the 1st First Aid, in his own words said "I thought her life could be saved").

Princess Diana ultimately died because of a suspicious 2 hour journey in an ambulance that snailed its way to a hospital 3.25 miles away averaging a speed of 25 mph and which conveniently bypassed 4 other hospitals on the way!

As it is there is new evidence that indicates that perhaps the reason Princess Diana was not wearing her seatbelt is because it was mysteriously but very conveniently jammed in such a way as to render it unusable!

Princess Diana: WOW! Why Did It Take 2 Hours To Get Her To Hospital Only 3.25 Miles Away!

Princess Diana

Most of us commoners are well aware that VIPs (Very Important Person(s)) get far better care and treatment than we do.

Take the instance of Paris Hilton in the now notorious incident (sigh...what's new) where her family and friends were preferentially allowed to jump the queue at the jail in which she's atoning her sins so that they could see for themselves how well those orange prison stripes complimented her pale complexion; conveniently bypassing people who'd been waiting on line upwards of 4 hours to see their loved ones.

NOTE: Paris Hilton is not a Very Important Person (as she'd like to think) but rather a Very Irritating Person hence the VIP status!

But I'm sure you get the point I am trying to get across: Celebrities, Heads of State and Royalty are normally accorded preferential and special treatment. Which brings me to the main point of this post:

WHY DID IT TAKE 2 HOURS TO GET PRINCESS DIANA TO A HOSPITAL 3.25 MILES AWAY?

The night she died Princess Diana was en route to hospital (and thus access to intensive care treatment that would have saved her life) for a whopping two hours! The hospital was a mere 3.25 miles away!

It Takes The Average Person 1 Hour To Walk A Distance Of 5 Miles!
3.25 miles...do you know how short that distance is?

It takes the average person 1 hour at a leisurely pace to walk a distance of 5 miles. Yet here we have the authorities taking their sweet-ole-time to get the critically injured mother of the future King of England to a hospital that was a mere 3.25 miles away.

And as if that wasn't enough would you believe that the ambulance carrying Princess Diana bypassed a couple or so nearer hospitals to get to the one in which she eventually died. The final bizarre straw to the perplexing events of that tragic night of August 31, 1997 was how when the ambulance FINALLY got to the hospital IT STOPPED FOR ANOTHER 10 MINUTES OUTSIDE THE HOSPITAL GATES!

One can only wonder what in heavens name were they doing in that ambulance?

Were they literally allowing Princess Diana to hemorrhage (bleed) to death? After all that was the official explanation for her death: that Princess Diana died from massive internal bleeding!

But let's just get back to the snail's pace that the ambulance took that night; maybe the ambulance had good reason to crawl slower than your average toddler!

Perhaps there was a lot of traffic snarling the Paris roads that night?

It's possible, but guess what? That actually wasn't the case! And even if there had been a lot of traffic, what of it?

They were transporting the Princess of Wales (or at least used to be) for gods sake! And though the House of Windsor may have stripped her of the title "Princess of Wales" the one title they could not relieve her of was: Mother of The Future King of England!

Surely for that fact alone Diana warranted expedited delivery to hospital!

In fact the usual case is to chopper (take by helicopter) a person of Princess Diana's status immediately to hospital. Diana was not even taken to the best equipped hospital that VIPs are normally rushed to in Paris and that particular hospital was less than five minutes away by helicopter and less than 20 minutes away by car; don't forget it took them 2 hours to eventually get her to hospital.

The authorities cited a number of pathetic reasons why it took so long to get the Princess to hospital foremost of which was the one where they said "Oh in France the ambulances are equipped with intensive care units with life saving equipment so usually such measures are conducted there first" (note: those aren't the exact words but the general gist of the official explanation at the time).

Well anyway it sure looks like those measures failed miserably!

But honestly that explanation is a load of premium crap! The more plausible explanation is that they (whoever was behind the plot) could not risk Diana getting to an uncontrolled environment such as a public hospital before she'd reached the point of no return; in other words to the critical medical point where nobody...not even the best surgeons in the world could save her life!

This aspect is just one of the many very disturbing incidents surrounding the untimely death of Princess Diana, Dodi Fayed and Henri Paul on that fateful night of August 31, 1997!

Princess Diana Assassination continued

Princess Diana: The Beginning

Princess Diana's Early Years

Princess Diana was born in 1961 to the Viscount Althorp, Edward John Spencer and his first wife the Viscountess Frances Spencer. Princess Diana was named for her mother and was called Diana Frances Spencer; she was the youngest daughter and had 3 siblings, two elder sisters and a younger brother Charles. Her early childhood was spent at the family home, Park House, which was located in Sandringham, Norfolk in England.

Princess Diana's childhood could best be described as turbulent, a pattern that was to haunt the princess for the remainder of her life. When she was 6 years old her mother and father got divorced over Lady Spencer's affair with with wallpaper heir Peter Shand Kydd.