Princess Diana Death: Trapped In A Web Of Spies!

Princess Diana Death: Caught In The Spotlight of 5 Intelligence Agencies!
At the time of her death Princess Diana and Dodi Fayed were being monitored by no less than five intelligence agencies which included the following: MI6, NSA, CIA, Mossad and the DGSE! Why such intense interest by so many intelligence groups?

Mossad
It is alleged that Mossad, the much vaunted Israeli intelligence agency was responsible for snatching the Mercedes Benz S280 that was involved in the crash, for the sole purpose of rigging it up for the crash. There're also whispers that Henri Paul was an asset of theirs, allegations that Mossad have never bothered to refute. (Note though that silence in this business does not necessarily symbolize guilt because quite often it's a case of damned if you do…damned if you don't! So in this particular case if Mossad had denied Henri Paul as being an informant of theirs there was sure to be a chorus of voices claiming such a denial was tacit admission to the fact!)

Whether it was MI6 or Mossad who snatched the Mercedes a few weeks before the crash is a moot point at this juncture, however strong circumstantial evidence suggests that the car was tampered with so that it could be remote controlled when the time was necessary and that a small explosive device was installed which would be triggered at the right time (the detonation of that device might be the explosion that several witnesses claim to have heard immediately after observing a blinding flash (strobe light?) just before the Mercedes slammed into the 13th pillar.

Why Would Israel Be Interested In Diana?
Israel had every reason to be concerned about Princess Diana for the very simple reason she was set to marry Dodi Fayed who so happened to be an Egyptian and a Muslim no less! Furthermore Diana was increasingly becoming a voice to be reckoned with in international politics and had in fact been nominated for a Nobel Prize for her campaign to abolish land mines.

The Israelis naturally harbored fears that Princess Diana would meddle in Middle Eastern politics in much the same way that she did with the land mines campaign (which by the way angered certain factions in "democratic" western nations that on the one hand condemn the violence of wars in third world regions like Africa whilst on the other hand, do their best to stoke such conflicts so they can sell their arms! (America is the biggest arms producer in the world! Those arms are produced for profit not altruistic reasons, so they need wars to fuel the sale of those arms! There's an interesting film about that subject starring Nicholas Cage entitled "Lord of War.")

It is very likely that Princess Diana egged on by Dodi Fayed could have brought a shift in perspective and focus on the plight of the Palestinians, spotlighting a harsh, cruel existence ironically reminiscent of the Nazi camps; a reality that is little reported by the much of the mainstream western media and something that Israel very much did not want the world to know! (which may explain why they so often "accidentally" shoot reporters and fire on U.N. troops).

DGSE

The General Directorate of External Security is France's foreign intelligence service and superceded the SDECE. It is nigh impossible that the logistics of this plot could have been achieved without French intelligence cooperation from the highest levels.

Such cooperation may explain why a few minutes prior to the Diana crash all police channels in Paris went inexplicably silent. This would also explain why the Paris Chief of Police was perplexed at why the ambulance transporting Princess Diana from the crash was taking so long to get to the hospital but more so at the reason why nobody could inform him of the ambulance's progress and whereabouts! (Looks like the normal French police were largely left out of the loop and only informed on a need-to-know basis.)

But perhaps the strongest factor suggesting French Intelligence involvement was their silence in the face of the avalanche of accusations emanating from Britain in the aftermath of Princess Diana's death. France and Britain have been centuries old rivals (France supplied Argentina with the deadly and very effective exocet missile against Britain in The Falklands War) and it is more than likely that French authorities (DGSE in this case) would have gone well out of their way to discredit MI6 had they not been part of the plot...or at the very least they would have made a super-concerted effort to bring those responsible to justice if for nothing else than to absolve the French authorities for any perceived mismanagement of the investigation!

NSA & CIA

The NSA (National Security Agency) of America has in its possession over 1050 secret electronic transcripts covering eavesdropped intercepts of Princess Diana's phone calls and conversations retained from other electronic bugging devices!

It is not unusual for friendly secret service agencies to share intelligence on subjects of interest and in fact routinely MI6 makes requests of its bigger and more powerful cousins to keep an eye on British Royalty traveling abroad ostensibly for the royal parties own safety. However the extent of international intelligence surveillance of Princess Diana in the final months of her life far exceeded the norm. Certainly the amount of data that the NSA and CIA had on her was way beyond routine.

It is speculated that one of the motives behind Princess Diana's assassination was her campaign to ban land mines which have had a truly devastating toll on children in Africa (maimed limbs). Though most of the responsible conflicts are long over thousands of unexploded mines still kill, injure and maim people everyday in those regions!

When Princess Diana approached and got a firm assurance from President Clinton to enact a bill that would abolish the United States involvement in the trade of land mines, that move was likely the final nail in the coffin that sealed her death. She now had very powerful enemies across both sides of the Atlantic! By getting Bill Clinton to publicly state that he was going to take action against America's involvement in the trade of land mines she had angered the very powerful American arms cartel that includes very prominent right wing political families in America.

In fact immediately following her death, President Clinton did an about turn on his promise to see a bill through that would abolish the trade of land mines. But the damage was already done and President Clinton was not going to be allowed to get off so easily either.

As the rest of world watched on in sheer incredulity at the absurdness of the spectacle, the events to impeach the most popular and successful American president of the last 40 years dramatically unfolded! What should have been nothing more than a domestic issue was quickly turned into a national issue of gigantic proportions.

What most of the American public didn't know was the impeachment move was being spearheaded by a right wing faction to remove a meddlesome democratic President from interfering with their new world order agenda! (That right wing faction included some of the same people who helped propagate the lie about WMDs (weapons of mass destruction) in Iraq to justify the war)

So you can bet that if those individuals went after President Clinton in the manner they did, they certainly had no qualms aiding and abetting in the assassination of Princess Diana.

Diana's anti-land mine campaign for which she had been nominated a Nobel Peace Prize was in direct conflict with the huge trans-global arms business (America as the biggest arms producer in the world is its center) and its consequential manufacture of wars in regions where they can test and sell their arms at great human loss but enormous profit! Such regions include Africa, The Middle East and South America!

MI6
Princess Diana's murder and its subsequent cover up could and would never have happened had it not been orchestrated by the British Secret Intelligence Services, in this case MI6! That said, the faction in MI6 responsible for her death would never have taken action had they not been authorized from some one very high up in the monarchy...and no that does not mean the Queen!

I have never believed that the Queen was involved in Diana's death and in fact contrary to public belief in the wake of Princess Diana's death, the Queen's actions were the strongest indication that she was not privy or part of the plot! People complained that the lack of any public display of anguish or sympathy for Diana's death from the monarchy was tantamount to an admission of guilt or complicity in her death.

I think it was the exact opposite! If the Queen had been involved she'd have gone out of her way to show how saddened she felt by the princess' death and thus dispel any whispers of involvement. Besides she also warned Princess Diana's former butler (in a protective manner for his own good as opposed to a threatening manner) with the words "There are powers at work in this country about which we have no knowledge."

But the fact of the matter is the Queen played it the way she saw fit and in the manner in which she was brought up, which with hindsight proved to be far removed from the expectations of the England of the day! Let's not forget that the Queen grew up in an era not known or long forgotten to many of us!

Summary: MI6's involvement in this convoluted conspiracy is quite substantial and thus rates a post all of its own and will indeed be my next post!

Princess Diana Death: A Parade Of Patsies

Princess Diana Assassination: Not The Usual Suspects
No self-respecting assassination plot is complete without a cast of patsies and this one is no different. This plot in fact has more than its fair share of patsies! The word paparazzi became common language after August 31, 1997, the night that Princess Diana was killed.

From the moment Princess Diana and Dodi Fayed arrived in Paris from Sardinia on August 30, 1997 they were harassed by an unusually aggressive breed of Paparazzi! One dark car in particular, filled with "paparazzi," weaved, swerved and braked recklessly and dangerously in front of their limo as Dodi and Diana were ferried from the airport.

Thus a precedent was being set for what was to come later that night leading up to the crash. In all likelihood that car and those men in the car were not paparazzi but rather security agents (intelligence agents) setting a pattern of behavior that would stick in everyone's mind thereby reinforcing the impression that it was the paparazzi who caused the crash!

Another strange coincidence (and certainly not the last) was that there were no British journalists entrenched within the ranks of the paparazzi that night in Paris. It's not as if Princess Diana's and Dodi Fayed's plans were a secret; which begs the question, were the British journalists warned to stay away? After all photos of Princess Diana commanded a hefty price so it would have been very much in the interest of those journalists to have been in Paris with the rest of the pack that weekend.

Parade of Patsies
Multiple eyewitness accounts from individuals in the tunnel at the time of the crash differentiate the main pack of the paparazzi from the two vehicles that appeared to work in tandem to cause the crash. These two vehicles, a powerful motorbike ridden by two riders and a white Fiat Uno were hot on the tail of the Mercedes prior to its entry into the Point d'Alma tunnel (the Fiat Uno was actually ahead of the Mercedes as if waiting in ambush) and they also happened to be way ahead of the other genuine paparazzi vehicles!

Thus by all accounts the real paparazzi were not in the tunnel at the moment of the crash! But they certainly made a very convenient and believable scapegoat or in any other language…patsy!

Paparazzi Frenzy Fest!
It is a well publicized fact that several persons took photos of the wrecked Mercedes and its occupants in the initial aftermath of the crash. Could some of those callous journalists have actually been security operatives (intelligence agents) who'd been loitering and mingling with the other paparazzi much of the day of August 30, 1997? The former Chief Superintendent of Scotland Yard, John McNamara, who was appointed by Mohamed Al Fayed to head an investigation of the crash confirmed from security camera footage from that night were indeed British and other foreign intelligence operatives mingling with the crowd of paparazzi.

Police Confiscate Crash Photos Supposedly Out Of Concern For Family Members
French Police wasted no time whatsoever in confiscating all photographs and other footage of the crash scene. The basis for their actions was apparently out of concern for the emotional trauma it would cause the relatives of the crash victims. But was that really their motivation; certainly it was quite convenient for the public to think so but what if there was another more sinister ulterior motive? Perhaps they were making sure that there were no loose ends left, like compromising photographs that could contradict the official account!

A Rash Of Press Agency Burglaries
Evidence tending to support the ulterior-motive angle is amply illustrated by the spate of similar burglaries that happened within hours of the crash. As things turned out, it so happened that not all the photos of the crash scene were confiscated by the French Police. Time is money, and nowhere is that adage as true as in the celebrity photojournalism business. Thus it really wasn't too surprising that some images of the crash got to London before the French Police and other security agents could get their hands on them. But ultimately it made little difference because London happened to be the plotters' backyard.

Just hours after the crash photojournalist Lionel Cherruault had his home burgled following a contact from a fellow journalist concerning photos taken of the crash in the Point d'Alma tunnel. Another photojournalist was to suffer the same fate too; Darryn Lyons had his London photo lab broken into the very same day that he received emailed images of the crash from French photo agent Laurent Sola.

What Was On The Photos That Could Not Be Allowed To Become Public?
While Dodi Fayed and Princess Diana were getting killed, the other decoy vehicles (a Mercedes S600 in which they'd been traveling all day and an escort Range Rover) had proceeded via another route to Dodi's apartment. When they got there, Dodi's other bodyguard (Kez Wingfield) and regular driver (Philippe Dourneau) heard of the crash and immediately rushed to the tunnel. Wingfield proceeded to call Dodi's father in London and informed him of the crash while Dourneau went to check on the wrecked vehicle and its occupants.

Dourneau's assessment of Princess Diana's injuries was that she had hurt her legs but otherwise appeared fine! There're also other witness accounts that largely contradict the official account, in that Princess Diana was not as badly injured as was made out. In fact many of the paparazzi claim that the Princess was sitting up and conscious after the crash at the time they took photos.

Could the fact that Princess Diana was not as critically injured as has been widely reported have been the real reason why the plotters were so frantic to get their hands on all photos?

Enter The Fallback Patsy!
Much in part to the numerous contradictory eyewitness accounts, it soon became clear to the plotters that pursuing the paparazzi-as-the-cause-of-the-crash angle was a lost cause. The grieving public simply wasn't buying it! It was time to move on to the fallback patsy, a scapegoat that turned out to be much more readily accepted by the world at large!

After several days of being held incommunicado the arrested paparazzi were eventually released but with strict warning not to talk or to publish any photos about the Diana crash if they valued their careers and lives! Like many a witness in this conspiracy, those journalists have largely kept quiet out of fear that they may wind up dead!

So who was the fallback patsy? The driver Henri Paul of course! The plot claims that he was a chronic alcoholic who happened to be heavily under the influence of booze the very night of the crash. Unfortunately for the plotters that theory too doesn't hold water (Read about Henri Paul alleged drunkenness here) and there only hope now is that their biggest ally of all (time) will not fail them!

Princess Diana Death: They Lied When They Said That Her Injuries Were Fatal!

Princess Diana: Did She Really Have To Die?
The injury that killed Princess Diana although critical was not fatal and in fact former President Ronald Reagan survived a similar injury when he was shot by John Hinckley in 1981! Surely if a 70 year old man could have survived such an injury why not a 36 year old woman in good health?

The French doctors who were part of the team that tried to resuscitate Princess Diana at the hospital following the crash cited a tear in the left pulmonary vein as the source of internal bleeding that ultimately led to her death...there was no mention of other specific lesions!

Their conclusion was in stark contrast to the remarks made by the French Minister of Health and other officials (and widely embraced by the public, the media, and disseminated by the official report) that Princess Diana died as a result of massive multiple internal injuries that left her no chance to survive!

If Princess Diana Had Been Taken To A Hospital Within An Hour After Crash She'd Probably Be Alive Today!
The simple truth is, it is very highly likely that if Princess Diana had been rushed to a hospital immediately instead of being snail-paced for two hours in an ambulance she will still be alive today! Several eminent doctors from around the globe (including French physicians) agreed that a timely evacuation to the hospital would have probably saved the Princess!

This tends to corroborate my theory postulating the real reason why the ambulance journey took so long; the plotters were waiting for Princess Diana to bleed out before presenting her to other personnel not privy or involved in the plot (waiting hospital staff).

Nobody really knows what went on in that ambulance and who was in it besides Princess Diana. Another questionable aspect concerning the 2-hour journey fiasco that has come to light is whatever happened to the police presence that was initially escorting the ambulance? More on the 2-Hour Ambulance Ride

Princess Diana's Condition When The First Emergency Vehicles Arrived!
The first witnesses to the crash site discovered Princess Diana seated on the floor of the car with her legs on the backseat and her head sandwiched between the backs of the two front seats. Her eyes were open and she was speaking indistinctly (bodyguard Trevor Rhys Jones supposedly heard her call out Dodi Fayed's name) which established Diana as being conscious at this point.

The first emergency vehicle arrived seven minutes after the crash (Sapeurs-Pompiers, a military emergency service) and the SAMU ambulance that took her to the hospital arrived eight minutes later. The physician from the SAMU ambulance said that Princess Diana was agitated and crying and repeatedly mover her left arm and right leg (once again establishing that Princess Diana was indeed still conscious at this point).

Apparently Princess Diana then went into cardiac arrest while being extracted form the wreckage so she was intubated, put on a respirator and given external chest massage to reestablish a heart rhythm.

Review Of The Injury That Killed Princess Diana
The crash caused Princess Diana's pulmonary vein to tear; this type of injury is commonly categorized as a deceleration injury because as the name implies it occurs when a person in motion is subjected to the massive traumatic force caused by sudden excessive deceleration. The Mercedes Benz S280 ramming into the pillar at 60 miles an hour definitely fits into this category.

The pulmonary vein transports oxygen-rich blood from the lungs to the heart where it is then pumped to the rest of the body. The pulmonary vein is a large vessel that transports a significant amount of blood. A rip or injury to this vessel will result in internal bleeding in the chest that can quite easily become rapidly fatal; however if the tear is minimal then there's a good chance that bleeding would be minimal and that expeditious repair of the tear would save the patient.

The fact that Princess Diana arrived at the hospital almost 2 hours later alive is evidence that the tear to her pulmonary vessel must have been a small tear that exuded blood at a slow rate. (Now you can see why it was so important for the ambulance to take its time getting to the hospital. If the tear had been bigger chances are they'd have gotten Diana to the hospital that much sooner. The outcome would have been the same though, because the assassins would have still ensured that by the time she was handed over to the Trauma Staff at the hospital she'd have been beyond resuscitation...which also explains the final 10 minute stop just outside the hospital gates).

As pre-eminent cardiologist Dr. John Ochsner (Chairman Emeritus of surgery at the Alton Ochsner clinic in New Orleans) put it: "depending on the size of the rent, or tear. If it wasn’t too big, they could put the patient on a heart lung machine and just go in and do the repair electively. It’s pretty obvious: with that lesion, if you can get them in hospital and on a heart lung machine early enough you can save them. But time is of essence."

He is just one of a very long list of several physicians who believe that expeditious transport of Princess Diana to a hospital operating room could well have saved her! Read the views of other physicians here.

It is tempting to conclude that the French emergency evacuation procedures are ironically to blame for Princess Diana's untimely death thereby relegating the entire incident as a mishandled tragic accident. But when one also considers the superb "bungling" of the investigation, disappearance of witnesses, the climbing body count, plethora of lies circulated and other suspicious events, that 2 hour hospital ride is really just a tad too convenient to have been anything but part of the assassination plot!